Ah, the things I learn on this board. It turns out that my M382
was rigged with a "Solent stay" sometime before I bought her.
I've always looked a bit askance at the mounting position of this
"odd" stay since it mounts less than a foot behind the headstay.
Since my sole use of an inner stay will be to hank on a storm
stays'l, and the best advice has always seemed to be to keep the
storm stays'l as close in to the mast as possible, maybe the
Solent stay is not such a good place for storm canvas? A
standard inner forestay, per Brewer's design, with running backs,
gets the canvas pretty close to the mast, thus keeping that
sailplan close together. Then some knowledgeable people pointed
out that Solent stays don't require running backs and all the
attendant extra rigging and fussing they require. This, they
say, would be especially important on a short handed boat, which
makes the Solent stay look all the better in the sense of
potentially stronger and more reliable.
So, which works out best in the real world of storm stays'ls -- a
center of effort that's further forward on a simpler and
potentially stronger stay, or keeping that CE as close to to the
mast as possible, but now having to deal with mast pumping,
running backs, etc? I'm not at all familiar with either
approach and I look forward to hearing what experience has
taught.
was rigged with a "Solent stay" sometime before I bought her.
I've always looked a bit askance at the mounting position of this
"odd" stay since it mounts less than a foot behind the headstay.
Since my sole use of an inner stay will be to hank on a storm
stays'l, and the best advice has always seemed to be to keep the
storm stays'l as close in to the mast as possible, maybe the
Solent stay is not such a good place for storm canvas? A
standard inner forestay, per Brewer's design, with running backs,
gets the canvas pretty close to the mast, thus keeping that
sailplan close together. Then some knowledgeable people pointed
out that Solent stays don't require running backs and all the
attendant extra rigging and fussing they require. This, they
say, would be especially important on a short handed boat, which
makes the Solent stay look all the better in the sense of
potentially stronger and more reliable.
So, which works out best in the real world of storm stays'ls -- a
center of effort that's further forward on a simpler and
potentially stronger stay, or keeping that CE as close to to the
mast as possible, but now having to deal with mast pumping,
running backs, etc? I'm not at all familiar with either
approach and I look forward to hearing what experience has
taught.